Keap and ActiveCampaign both target small businesses that have outgrown a basic email tool. They arrive from opposite directions: Keap from sales and money, ActiveCampaign from email and behaviour.
The price gap is large enough that the question is really what Keap's extra buys you.
Key takeaways
- Keap: from $249/mo including two users, +$39 per additional user, with implementation required.
- ActiveCampaign: $15 to $145/mo at 1,000 contacts, no onboarding fee, self-serve.
- Keap includes quoting, invoicing and payment collection attached to the contact record.
- ActiveCampaign has the deeper automation builder and a far larger integration catalogue.
- The gap is roughly 3–5× at equivalent team sizes, before Keap's implementation fee.
Keap if you quote and invoice from the same system that markets — contractors, clinics, consultancies where the proposal and the payment matter as much as the campaign. ActiveCampaign if the job is marketing automation and money is handled elsewhere, in which case you get better automation for a fraction of the price.
Pricing compared
| Keap plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Base plan | From $249/mo (billed $2,988/yr), 2 users included |
| Additional users | $39/user/mo |
| Contacts | Priced by volume tier |
| Implementation | Required, quoted per customer |
| Text marketing | Included at tier 1, then from $24/mo |
| ActiveCampaign plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Starter | $15/mo annually ($19 monthly) |
| Plus | $49/mo annually ($59 monthly) |
| Pro | $79/mo annually ($99 monthly) |
| Enterprise | from $145/mo annually ($179 monthly) |
A five-person team is $366/month on Keap before implementation and contact-tier increases. The same team on ActiveCampaign Pro at 1,000 contacts is $79/month. Even allowing for ActiveCampaign's CRM add-on and contact growth, the gap stays several-fold.
Pricing for both products was checked against the public Scalry and Keap and ActiveCampaign pricing pages in August 2026. SaaS pricing changes often — confirm the current numbers with each vendor before you commit to a plan.
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Capability | Keap | ActiveCampaign |
|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation | Mature and deep | Best in class |
| Quoting and invoicing | Included — core strength | Not native |
| Payment collection | Included | Not native |
| CRM and pipelines | Included | Paid add-on |
| Email deliverability focus | Standard | A long-standing priority |
| Landing pages and forms | Included | Included |
| Booking and calendars | Included | Not native |
| Integrations | Moderate | Around 900 |
| Implementation | Required, quoted separately | Self-serve |
| Consultant ecosystem | Large and certified | Smaller |
| Bills on | Users + contacts | Contacts |
The costs that don't appear on either pricing page
- Keap's implementation. Required, quoted per customer, and never published. This is the number that decides year one.
- Keap per-user growth. $39/month each above the two included.
- Keap contact tiers. Price scales with list size on top of the user count.
- ActiveCampaign's CRM add-on, if you need pipelines.
- ActiveCampaign's all-contacts billing on accounts opened from 3 November 2025 — dormant records are billable.
- Booking alongside ActiveCampaign, which is not native.
Want to see what your own numbers look like? Start a workspace and price it against the table above.
Start free14-day free trial · No credit card required
Where Keap wins
Quote to cash in one system
The proposal, the invoice, the payment and the follow-up automation all hang off the same contact record. For a service business this removes a genuine daily friction that no amount of marketing automation addresses.
Someone sets it up for you
Keap's required implementation is often described as a hidden cost. For a business where nobody will own configuration, it is closer to the actual product — a self-serve trial that stalls in week two is worth less than a paid setup that finishes.
A real CRM without an add-on
Pipelines and ownership are included rather than purchased separately, and lifecycle automation has two decades of refinement behind it.
Certified consultants exist
You can hire someone who knows Keap on short notice. ActiveCampaign's partner market is thinner.
Where ActiveCampaign wins
Considerably better automation for far less
Conditional branching, goal logic, split tests inside flows and site tracking, at $79/month against Keap's $249 base. On the specific axis both products claim, ActiveCampaign is both cheaper and stronger.
No implementation gate
You can be sending on Monday. Keap's required implementation is a scheduling dependency as well as an unpublished cost.
The integration catalogue
Around 900 apps against Keap's more modest list. If your stack includes anything niche, this matters.
Deliverability attention
A visible, sustained investment in sending reputation, with the diagnostics to act on it.
Which should you choose?
| If this is you | Pick |
|---|---|
| You quote and invoice clients | Keap |
| Nobody internally will own setup | Keap |
| Service business where payment is part of the flow | Keap |
| You want certified help available to hire | Keap |
| Marketing automation is the actual job | ActiveCampaign |
| Budget is a real constraint | ActiveCampaign |
| Complex behavioural sequences | ActiveCampaign |
| You need to launch this month | ActiveCampaign |
Get Keap's implementation quote in writing before you compare anything. It is not published, it is required, and it is the single largest unknown in this comparison. A useful way to think about the premium: Keap costs roughly $3,000 a year more than ActiveCampaign for a small team, before implementation. If quoting and invoicing elsewhere costs you less than that in subscriptions and friction, the premium is not earned. For a contractor sending twenty quotes a month it usually is; for a business that invoices quarterly through an accountant it usually is not.
How to test Keap and ActiveCampaign without wasting a fortnight
Feature matrices settle less than two days of real use. Both products will demo well; what you want to know is which one is annoying on a Tuesday.
- Rebuild one real campaign in each, end to end — the page, the form, the follow-up, the handoff. Not a test campaign; the one that matters.
- Import a real segment, not ten sample contacts. Field mapping problems only appear with real data.
- Time the boring tasks. Logging an activity, editing a sequence, finding last month's numbers. You will do these hundreds of times.
- Give it to the person who will actually use it, not the person evaluating it. Adoption is decided by them.
- Price both at next year's size before deciding — Keap and ActiveCampaign scale on different axes, so today's comparison will not hold.
- Test the export. Confirm you can get your data out on day one, not on the day you want to leave.
Questions to ask before you commit
Whichever way you are leaning, these are the questions that change the answer. Work through them against your own numbers rather than anyone's feature matrix — including this one.
- Do you invoice from the CRM? If yes, this is basically decided.
- What is the implementation quote? Ask before anything else.
- Will anyone own configuration internally?
- How complex are your automations? Count the branches.
- How many users, and how fast growing? Keap charges per user.
- Where does payment currently happen? If it already works, Keap's advantage shrinks.
If you cannot answer the first three, you are not ready to choose between Scalry and Keap or ActiveCampaign yet — you are still deciding what you need, which is a cheaper problem to solve first.
A third option, briefly
If you want the automation without the invoicing and without ActiveCampaign's contact-based escalation, a flat-priced platform sits between them. Scalry includes CRM, funnels and booking with content generation, but does not quote or invoice — if that is your requirement, Keap is the honest answer.
That is the whole pitch, and it is last for a reason — if one of the two tools above fits, use it. Our pricing study compares thirteen platforms including both, and the cost calculator prices them against your own team size.
Frequently asked questions
Is Keap worth the price over ActiveCampaign?
Only if you use the invoicing and payment side, or genuinely need paid implementation. On marketing automation alone ActiveCampaign is both cheaper and more capable, so the premium has to be earned by the money features.
How much does Keap actually cost?
From $249/month billed annually with two users included, plus $39 per additional user, plus contact-tier increases, plus required implementation that is quoted individually and not published. A five-person team is $366/month before implementation.
Does ActiveCampaign do invoicing?
No. Quoting, invoicing and payment collection attached to the contact record are Keap features with no ActiveCampaign equivalent, and that is the clearest reason to choose Keap.
Which has better automation?
ActiveCampaign, on most measures — conditional branching, goal-based logic and split testing inside flows are stronger. Keap's automation is mature and perfectly capable, but it is not where the product leads.
Is Keap's implementation fee negotiable?
It is quoted per customer rather than listed, which means it varies and is worth discussing. What matters is getting the number in writing before comparing licence prices, because it materially changes the year-one total.
If you do not invoice from the CRM, most of Keap's premium is buying something you will not use. You can rebuild one real campaign inside Scalry before moving anything else.
Start your free trialSee pricing14-day free trial · No credit card required
